Aintaerjection

Liberalitas, Crudelitas, Insanitas
Work · Play · Photos · Musings · Projects · About

Google’s Webgemony

You sit down in front of the computer.

You open up Google Chrome, go to Google Mail to check your e-mail. While there, you find your friends on Google Chat and they request some pictures. So you use Google Desktop to search for those pictures. When you find them, you remembered you wanted to look up that shop in the picture so you head to Google Maps and use Google Streetview to look through the neighborhood. After all that’s done, you progress to Google News to find out what’s going on in the world, Google Reader to keep up with your feeds, Google Images to find cute pictures of bunnies, Google Calendar to schedule your day, only to find out you need to call your friend in Europe so you have Google Voice connect your call…

It is virtually impossible to avoid Google in life now, its services being so pervasive and easy to use that in a few short years Google has gone from simply a search provider to an entire Internet experience provider. Google’s hegemony on the net and its ability to make money has allowed the company to grow beyond the confines of the Internet into other businesses: merchant transactions, browsers, operating systems. And in all Google’s offerings, one overarching goal unites them. Push toward a web-based world.

It is clear to see why. Google’s dominance on the web is undeniable, and every step we take toward a web-based society, with data stored on the Internet, is a step that Google is eager to pave a path for so that it can index that data, parse that data, and ultimately sell ads based on that data.

Because of this business model, Google can always be counted on to push for a more open Internet, standardized Internet, free Internet. And it would never “become evil” because it is one of the first companies to realize that community goodwill is a resource, and has spent time cultivating this resource until it has received almost a subconscious cult-following. But sooner or later, we must come to realize that what Google is pushing for, and what we are slowly training ourselves to depends on, is one fact.

Google is Internet.

No matter how benevolent the organization, how strong its ethics, there remains something fundamentally flawed to trusting all services to a single, for-profit vendor. Recently a Google SSL certificate snafu disabled secure connections to all Google services. Suddenly I was unable to chat through Google Chat. Though I had other means, such as AIM, the Web-as-Google future would not be so fortunate.

Cloud computing, the social web, and software-as-a-service are all pushes for a usage pattern that stresses the Internet more than just as a content delivery platform, but a complete computing platform, a lifestyle platform. Under such a platform, the focus would be moved away from the hardware device. The device with which you access the Internet becomes almost inconsequential as your storage has moved to the network, your software has moved to the network, and indeed, your entire identity has moved to the network. And it is this future that Google is primed for.

By relinquishing control over technology to the network, we are in essence giving up control over what makes us individuals for what makes us a community. It is not a dystopia we head toward, and Google is not the next “Evil Corp,” but at a point, we must determine for ourselves how much is ‘we’ and how much is ‘me.’

Fun with Unicode – 1

Ⓣⓦⓐⓢ ⓑⓡⓘⓛⓘⓖ ⓐⓝⓓ ⓣⓗⓔ ⓢⓛⓘⓣⓗⓨ ⓣⓞⓥⓔⓢ ⓓⓘⓓ ⓖⓨⓡⓔ ⓐⓝⓓ ⓖⓘⓜⓑⓞⓛ ⓘⓝ ⓣⓗⓔ ⓦⓐⓑⓔ

⒜⒧⒧ ⒨⒤⒨⒮⒴ ⒲⒠⒭⒠ ⒯⒣⒠ ⒝⒪⒭⒪⒢⒪⒱⒠⒮ ⒜⒩⒟ ⒯⒣⒠ ⒨⒪⒨⒠ ⒭⒜⒯⒣⒮ ⒪⒰⒯⒢⒭⒜⒝⒠

Hilarious Enough

It would appear that a recent server snafu has redirected all subdomains of pyoko.org to me. This has led to a general confusion as people who are looking for SolidSharkey, jinmen juushin, burichan (ew) are all being redirected to me.


Google Analytics showing a brilliant 709% increase in traffic

I don’t mind the extra visitors, but I feel like I am shorting them on their intended purpose of being entertained by a circle of jerks. So until we can sort this out, please don’t e-mail me asking where so-and-so went.

New Font Ideas

Being inspired by Ironic Sans, I have come up with some other font ideas.

  • Times New Greek: like the Roman variant but with more pederasty.
  • Tacoma: similar to Tahoma, but will crash your computer irrecoverably if you type at a certain rhythm.
  • Sebastien: the crabbier version of Arial.
  • Millennium Gothic: impractical due to being ten times the size of Century Gothic.
  • AOL Instant Courier: unused because it always comes out as neon pink Comic Sans telling people to look at your pix.
  • Garados: evolved from Garamond at level 20. Learns Dragon Rage.
  • Onager MS: in the same class as Trebuchet MS but uses torsion-powered kerning.
  • Hallucida Sans Unicode: its got trippy code points all over, despite all of them changing and tasting like purple. Also, U+262D is a unicorn and U+2363 can kiss my ass.

American Impossibility: Life

It seems to me that there are great contradictions within the great traditional hero-worship of America’s Founding Fathers. With the recent hearings for the new Supreme Court Justice, debates of what said Fathers have written and what they mean have taken on renewed interest. I contend that what was set forth by the Founding Fathers is ridiculous and espouses egotism.

Key to this is the Great American belief in entitlement. Each individual, so the bicentennial wisemen state, has the right to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness. It is also held by them that such rights are self-evident and unalienable. I hold that it is far from evident what they even mean by the three words, much less how they are evident of themselves or how they cannot be violated. I will start with Life.

Life is the center of most controversy in all of human history. Mostly with its removal. But never is it clear what Life truly is. We all feel we know what life is, but when pressed on the point, our understanding dissipates and we can only resort to analogies. Life, the Buddhists say, is like a flame. This I think is not unacceptable. Life to me is a process, much like a flame. A flame consumes resources, and outputs energy, leaving behind smoke and carbon dioxide. Life consumes resources, and outputs lethargy, leaving behind dung and carbon dioxide. Already the similarities are striking.

However, if Life is to be a process, it must be a special one because we do not harbor such concepts as “Right to Fire.” What then, is so special about Life that it must be protected at the expense of all else? Probably the difficulty in its continued existence. A fire provides the same functions as any other fire, but one life does not do the same as another. Telling a parent who has lost a child “It’s okay you can have another one” just doesn’t quite have the same effect. But given its special nature, the right to life ought to reside in the life itself. Yet the same proponents who cry the unborn deserve life refuse the right to life of one choosing death.

If there were such a thing as Right to Life, then there must also exist such a thing as Right to Death. After all, death is the natural conclusion to life. Yet somehow, individuals are granted one but not the other, probably for purposes of continued taxation. If Life were really an inalienable right, then how can Nature, State, and Man take it away at a whim? Obviously there is no such right, or if there was then it is alienable by everyone. And to entitle a living person with the right to live is a state-issued intellectual slap-in-the-face, akin to giving water the right to be wet.

Life is not a right, life is a privilege: a privilege bestowed upon the bundles of chemicals doing nasty things to each other that we call a person; one that is loaned to us to take advantage of, and if we were any bit grateful, we would pay back the debt. All that the wig and stockings sporting men of the 18th century have put forth then is an ideal, far removed from reality…

Postscript: Lack of Right to Life does not imply granting the Right to Death to everybody and anybody, Government least of all.